JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 3, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Colmenares Escobar

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Modulación de la Sentencia C-567/19.

El peticionario le solicitó a la Corporación que se module el precitado fallo, en el entendido de que los casos de reincidencia se encuentran comprendidos en el artículo 313 numeral 4 inciso 1º de la Ley 906 de 2004.

Considera la Corte que la pretensión es improcedente, pues las modulaciones sobre la temporalidad o contenido de las normas se efectúan al momento del fallo, toda vez que una decisión en tal sentido afectaría el principio de la cosa juzgada constitucional, en tanto implicaría reabrir el debate y fallar sobre algo ya decidido.

Con base en lo anterior, se RECHAZA la modulación pretendida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de modulacion de la sentencia C- 567 de 2019, formulada por el ciudadano Jorge Luis Colmenares Escobar el tres (03) de febrero de dos mil veinte (2020).
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR al solicitante esta decision por la Secretaria General de esta corporacion.
  3. TERCERO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.